Share
Merit Systems Protection Board: Time-And-Attendance and Personnel Practices Need Attention: Ggd-91-104
U. S. Government Accountability Office ( ; U. S. Government Accountability Office ( (Author)
·
Bibliogov
· Paperback
Merit Systems Protection Board: Time-And-Attendance and Personnel Practices Need Attention: Ggd-91-104 - U. S. Government Accountability Office ( ; U. S. Government Accountability Office (
Choose the list to add your product or create one New List
✓ Product added successfully to the Wishlist.
Go to My Wishlists
Origin: U.S.A.
(Import costs included in the price)
It will be shipped from our warehouse between
Wednesday, August 14 and
Wednesday, August 21.
You will receive it anywhere in United Kingdom between 1 and 3 business days after shipment.
Synopsis "Merit Systems Protection Board: Time-And-Attendance and Personnel Practices Need Attention: Ggd-91-104"
Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed allegations made against senior officials of the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), on: (1) the time-and-attendance (T&A) practices of the three MSPB Board members and their personal staffs; (2) MSPB detailing of certain Schedule-C appointees and the pay level MSPB set for a Schedule-C appointee during a limited emergency Senior Executive Service (SES) appointment; (3) the role and organizational independence of the MSPB Inspector General (IG) in reviewing MSPB activities; and (4) a racially and sexually discriminatory working environment.
GAO found that: (1) MSPB Board members are not required to work specific duty schedules or specific hours and can maintain whatever work schedules and office hours they deem appropriate to do their work, but all other MSPB employees must comply with the agency's established T&A procedures and requirements; (2) T&A records showed that Board and Executive Office employees, timekeepers, and supervisors frequently failed to properly prepare and process T&A requirements; (3) MSPB improperly detailed three Schedule-C appointees from the Vice Chairman's office in November 1990, when their employment should have ended upon that key official's departure; (4) MSPB made three initial SES appointments at a pay level higher than its pay-setting policy authorized; (5) the MSPB IG improperly reported to the Executive Director rather than directly to the Chairman, which violated the GAO standard and an Office of Management and Budget requirement for IG independence; and (6) of 31 current and former MSPB staff interviewed, 9 stated that they were the victims of racial or sexual discrimination or perceived that such discrimination existed at MSPB.
- 0% (0)
- 0% (0)
- 0% (0)
- 0% (0)
- 0% (0)
All books in our catalog are Original.
The book is written in English.
The binding of this edition is Paperback.
✓ Producto agregado correctamente al carro, Ir a Pagar.
