Share
The Logic of the Articles in Traditional Philosophy: A Contribution to the Study of Conceptual Structures
E. M. Barth
(Author, Translated by)
·
T. C. Potts
(Translated by)
·
Springer
· Paperback
The Logic of the Articles in Traditional Philosophy: A Contribution to the Study of Conceptual Structures - Barth, E. M. ; Barth, E. M. ; Potts, T. C.
Choose the list to add your product or create one New List
✓ Product added successfully to the Wishlist.
Go to My Wishlists
Origin: U.S.A.
(Import costs included in the price)
It will be shipped from our warehouse between
Wednesday, August 14 and
Wednesday, August 21.
You will receive it anywhere in United Kingdom between 1 and 3 business days after shipment.
Synopsis "The Logic of the Articles in Traditional Philosophy: A Contribution to the Study of Conceptual Structures"
When the original Dutch version of this book was presented in 1971 to the University of Leiden as a thesis for the Doctorate in philosophy, I was prevented by the academic mores of that university from expressing my sincere thanks to three members of the Philosophical Faculty for their support of and interest in my pursuits. I take the liberty of doing so now, two and a half years later. First and foremost I want to thank Professor G. Nuchelmans warmly for his expert guidance of my research. A number of my most im- portant sources were brought to my attention by him. During the whole process of composing this book his criticism and encouragement were carried out in a truly academic spirit. He thereby provided working conditions that are a sine qua non for every author who is attempting to approach controversial matters in a scientific manner, conditions which, however, were not easily available at that time. In a later phase I also came into contact with Professors L. M. de Rijk and J. B. Ubbink, with both of whom I had highly stimulating discussions and exchanges of ideas. The present edition contains some entirely new sections, viz. 1-9, IV-29, V-9, V-20, VII-14 (iii), (iv), VII-17 (i), VIII-22, IX-17, IX-19, X-9 and XI-8. Section X-9 was inspired by a remark made by Professor A.
